| As the Wall Street Journal reports this morning, in what are called a"loss-share" agreements, buyers of failed banks
                                    are getting billions
 of dollars in government guarantees to snatch up the bank's bad
 assets. To entice buyers, the Federal
                                    Deposit Insurance Corporation is
 offering to cover around 80 percent of the losses associated with
 buying a bank. The
                                    result, the WSJ points out, is a massive subsidy to
 the private equity industry, and a huge risk to the American taxpayer.
 
 As
                                    bank failures have mounted this year, much has been made of the
 FDIC's dwindling Deposit Insurance Fund. But, as the WSJ
                                    reports, the
 FDIC's potential risk through loss-share agreements "is about six
 times the amount remaining in its fund
                                    that guarantees consumers'
 deposits."
 
 Though the WSJ doesn't go so far as to say the enormous guarantees
 are,
                                    in fact, sweetheart deals, it's hard to imagine a better scenario
 for bank buyers. (Except maybe the FDIC offering to guarantee
                                    100
 percent of the total losses associated with buying a failed bank.)
 
 The FDIC, which first turned to loss share
                                    agreements during the S&L
 crisis in the early 1990s, maintains that the guarantees are much less
 costly than liquidating
                                    a failed bank's assets. Still, examine the
 WSJ's accounting of the sale of Alabama's Colonial Bank earlier this
 month:
 
 "The FDIC, assuming its traditional role, brokered a sale of the
 bank's deposits to BB&T Corp., ensuring that
                                    customers wouldn't see
 any interruption. It also agreed to help BB&T buy a $15 billion
 portfolio of Colonial's loans
                                    and other assets by agreeing to absorb
 more than 80% of future losses. Under the deal, the most BB&T can lose
 is
                                    $500 million, the bank says, and that is only in the unlikely event
 that the entire portfolio becomes worthless. The FDIC
                                    is on the hook
 to cover the rest."
 
 
 That's right, BB&T can only lose $500 million on a $15 billion
 investment.
                                    Which is why many buyers of failed banks are ecstatic over
 the details of these deals, even if it means taking on shoddy
 mortgages,
                                    commercial loans and other under-performing assets. To wit,
 this testimonial from Wilshire State Bank CEO Joanne Kim: "After
                                    we
 understood how [the loss-share] works, we were literally overjoyed."
 |