AFTER THE BALLBowie BondsRock 'n' roll officially stops being revolutionary.By Mark Steyn Posted Thursday, May 8, 1997, at 3:30 AM ET
I have seen the future of rock 'n'
roll and it's called Prudential Insurance. In case you're one of those old-fashioned rock fans who doesn't read the financial
press, let me explain: Several weeks back, $55 million worth of David Bowie was put on the market and Prudential snapped it
up in minutes. You can now buy bonds in David Bowie--if you can find them. Analysts at Moody's gave them their much-coveted triple-A rating,
based on a 7.9 percent annual return against the projected earnings of "Space Oddity," "Jean Genie," and the rest of the back
catalog. Bowie is the first pop star to hold a bond offering, so you can't buy bonds in, say, Gary U.S. Bonds, though that
may be because he's only had one hit in the last 15 years. You'd think the David Bowie Class A Royalty-Backed
Notes, as they're officially known on Wall Street, would have caused a big splash in an industry that prides itself on permanent
novelty, but in all the hubbub over his 50th-birthday celebrations, Bowie forgot to mention it. When the story
did emerge, the rock press was mostly silent or flummoxed. Rolling Stone gave it a paragraph. Pop fans
know their idols are rich, and they consider excess a respectable musical tradition. Few devotees of Michael Jackson begrudge
him his llamas, or even the young Scandinavian lad, winner of a Norwegian Michael Jackson look-alike competition, who accompanies
him on his world travels. But bonds? That's not megastar hedonism, just boring squaresville suit stuff. It was left to Bowie's business manager
to argue that, au contraire, it was just what you'd expect from the old Rebel Rebel. "The fact that David is
the first musician to do it is wonderful," said Bill Zysblat, bullishly, "because he is always on the cutting edge." So that's
what a cutting-edge rock 'n' roller is in 1997: a guy with a triple-A rating on Wall Street. Zysblat's other clients, Crosby,
Stills, and Nash--that's a band, not a brokerage firm--are also expected to go public. Once upon a time, rock stars weren't
rated by Moody's. They were moody. They self-destructed, they choked to death on their own vomit, they
hoped to die before they got old. But those who failed (to die, that is) grew increasingly concerned about the fine print.
In the '80s, Columbia was so anxious to sign Paul McCartney to a new album deal that they offered $20 million. Chicken feed,
he said; what else have you got? They rummaged around for a bit, and then told McCartney they'd throw in the entire song catalog
of Frank Loesser, composer of, among others, Guys and Dolls and How to Succeed in Business Without
Really Trying. As you'll have noticed, both shows have had successful '90s revivals on Broadway and their scores have
been continuous earners for McCartney. On the other hand, can you name a Paul McCartney album from the last 15 years? So who
do you think came out on top of that deal? McCartney's no fool in this area: Among the other nest eggs he owns are the score
to Annie and, believe it or not, "Happy Birthday to You." The latter was written in 1883 by two sisters,
Mildred J. Hill and Patty Smith Hill but, thanks to a legal judgment in the 1930s, is still in copyright. Every time it's
sung in public--for example, whenever a TV station uses that clip of Marilyn Monroe serenading President Kennedy--McCartney
gets a check. McCartney, of course,
is now Sir Paul--the first rock star to be knighted. Having spent decades trying to maintain their pose as countercultural
revolutionaries, the aristrockracy is finally coming out of the closet. To his credit, though, even Mick Jagger feels the
trend toward rock respectability is going too far. Recently, he dropped in on Elton John at his country house in Berkshire
and was shocked by his old friend's condition: "I've never seen so much porcelain," he complained, wondering what happened
to the glitterballs, strobe lights, amyl nitrate, cocaine, and louche young men. "If I see another fucking
piece of porcelain ..." Not so long ago, Elton was routinely reviled in the tabloids as a corpulent, drug-addled old poof (as the British
say). Now, having conquered the demons of booze, food, and drugs, he's the first rock star to be in danger of OD'ing on gentility.
A beloved national treasure, second only to the queen mother, he's known to friends as "the Martha Stewart of rock 'n' roll"
and offers such fellow pop stars as Jon Bon Jovi his services as interior designer. Last year, he was invited to jive with
her majesty to "Rock Around the Clock," dancing queen to queen. Ah, yes: "Rock Around the Clock." "It was mid-'50s
rock 'n' roll," Rolling Stone's Robert Palmer once wrote, "that blew away, in one mighty, concentrated blast,
the accumulated racial and social proprieties of the centuries." Revolution is a crucial part of rock's self-image. Like the
Khmer Rouge, after their own "mighty, concentrated blast" in Cambodia, rock even has its own Year Zero. Pick up Billboard's
Hot 100-chart reference books--or almost any pop reference book--and they all start on July 9, 1955, the dawn of "the rock
era," when "Rock Around the Clock" got to No. 1. Never mind that one of the writers of the song was born in the 19th century,
or that Mitchell Parish, veteran lyricist (though born in the 20th century, just) of "Sleigh Ride" and "Stardust,"
once described it to me as "a good, conventional Tin Pan Alley song"--there go the social proprieties of the centuries. Some of those proprieties have proved surprisingly
resilient. And, since rock's into defining moments, perhaps we can agree that, if July 9, 1955, is Year Zero, then the day
David Bowie became the Man Who Sold Himself--for a rock 'n' roller's only inventory is his image and his songs--is Year Zero-Zero-Zero-Zero-Zero-Zero--the
$55 million day rock 'n' roll finally gave up on revolution. Maybe we should treasure all those bullet-riddled gangsta rappers,
the only pop stars who don't just talk the talk but walk the walk, even unto the grave. But how long can they hold out? NASDAQ
Shakur anyone? Mark Steyn
writes about popular music for Slate and about film for the London Spectator.
|